Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus RAHIM KHAN

The appearance of the parties' appearance and absence of the CPC Civil Code Code Order IX resulted in the trial court setting the ex parte order against one of the defendants O IX, R 7 & O IX, R 13 Dismisses the defendant's request to put the point on. O IX, R 7, CPC restriction is not limited to, during the approval of the suit, the order for setting the prior order under O IX, R 7, CPC was applicable while ordering On the one hand it was able to be retained under O IX, R 13, CPC after the letter was approved; it was not correct to reject the application for placing a pre-limitation order through trial, OI, R 7. , CPC should be open minded and not rigid. The previous order of absence of the defendants, unless it is set aside, does not allow the defendant to go back to the former position if he was present he could not be prevented of professional membership. In the case of the former position, however, the defendant was obliged to show good cause, and unless he did so, he could not be released from it. The defendant was set aside and allowed to stand trial for claiming multiple scrutiny of the plaintiff's witnesses on the pretrial hearing, along with the plaintiff's testimony in connection with the payment of certain costs. , If its interests are at stake, list of supreme court advocates from Skardu lawyer