Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus NIZAMUDDIN


Section 10 (2) of the EQE Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975, did not determine the nature of the property by the chairman of the board, nor was there any trust process in relation to this property, nor did it show any evidence. Was owned by a property. Income from any religious, charitable or educational trust or income from the said property was applied to a trust made for religious, charitable or educational purposes, which did not indicate whether the survey's registration depended on it. This question was whether the property was religious, religious or not, in any educational sense or linked to any form of trust, to show the nature of the trust, or to prove the fact that the property was acquired. Was being applied to charitable, religious. Or for educational purposes, the chairman of the board had an arbitrary order restraining the property as property of the evacuation trust, with no evidence to the contrary.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Quaidabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.