Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus NIZAMUDDIN

Section 10 (2) of the EQE Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975, did not determine the nature of the property by the chairman of the board, nor was there any trust process in relation to this property, nor did it show any evidence. Was owned by a property. Income from any religious, charitable or educational trust or income from the said property was applied to a trust made for religious, charitable or educational purposes, which did not indicate whether the survey's registration depended on it. This question was whether the property was religious, religious or not, in any educational sense or linked to any form of trust, to show the nature of the trust, or to prove the fact that the property was acquired. Was being applied to charitable, religious. Or for educational purposes, the chairman of the board had an arbitrary order restraining the property as property of the evacuation trust, with no evidence to the contrary. advocate for immigration from Ghari Dupatta lawyer