AZHAR WALI MUHAMMAD versus TOOBA TAYYAB
Sections 17 (4) and 24 of the Cantonment Rent Regression Act 1963 require the personal control of the landlord's tenant who after considering the evidence of the witnesses who sought to evict the tenant on the basis that Residential accommodation is essential for her parents to use. The widow's sister concluded that the feudal family had an inescapable need to treat her personally, but her husband, who appeared as her lawyer, had stated that her own Parents and widows are in need of questioning for the height of their spouse's relative landlord's request for evacuation does not fit the definition of family; under the circumstances, R is not accepted by the rent controller's order. Can the High Court put aside the appeal [words and phrases]?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Multan lawyer
