Find a Lawyer

HASSAN MASOOD MALIK versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

During the execution of the section 13 and 19 eviction orders filed by the landlord against the tenant, the parties agreed on the condition that the landlord withdraw his removal request. The lease period will be extended to a fixed period and after the end of that period, the tenant will vacate the premises and hand over the land to the landlord and the tenant will pass the ejection regulatory order in accordance with the terms of the contract. The parties agreed to increase the rent on the premises. After the termination of the agreements reached between the parties, the parties, the landlord, filed an application for execution, but, the tenant also filed an objection, stating that as a result of the agreement between the parties, The rent has been substantially increased, a new tenancy agreement. The process of law came into being automatically and in the circumstances the petitioner filed by the landlord could not be accepted, the court accepted the objection filed by the tenant and concluded That the eviction order issued by the tenant controller was not enforceable on the basis that a fresh tenancy agreement. The latest terms were entered into by parties and the terms agreed between the parties indicate that the tenancy was extended only for a limited period in which the rent was increased. Prove that the parties have entered into a new tenancy agreement in relation to the property in dispute as claimed by the tenant. lawer from fb area from Naukot lawyer