SIRAJ BEGURN versus D.C.
The testimony of Section 44 30, Part I and 33 32 of the evidence was not intended to kill the accused, nor can it be said that the collision with the brick on the deceased would have caused him to fall down and his 'S head was severely hit. The cause of the death, both superficial and ultimately, was not attributed to the fatal injury suspect, and the injury assigned to him was a straightforward injury that led to the accusation, therefore, Section 4304, Part I or Part II is not covered under PPC but only under section. 323, PPC and he was sentenced according to which he had already sentenced him to prison.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Sohawa District Daska lawyer
