MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Civil procedure code of CPC's written statement dispatched to Order VIII and O VIII, R1 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The defendant failed to file a written statement in the case despite the direction of the High Court in this case. Stay. In the argument that he was not allowed to cross-examine the witnesses presented by the plaintiff, neither the Appellate Court nor the High Court accepted it in the review, and this record does not show that he was a witness. Wanted to investigate but the trial court stopped him from doing so. Defendants' mere thought-provoking record did not reveal any error of law interference in which the appeal was dismissed in the High Court's leave decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Shahdad Kot lawyer
