Special Relief Act 1877 Section 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Suit for Permanent Order for Protection of Property Under this plaintiff, three court cases were discovered, a co-partner who is not in exclusive possession of the aforesaid land. Yes, the order was not entitled to a permanent injunction. The plaintiff conceded in his claim that the defendant had purchased the land in question from one of the partners, the documentary evidence on the record also proved the common ownership of the parties with the others, and, thus, both Will have the right to his possession The defendant was rightfully dismissed by the three courts in order to prevent the defendant from interfering with the case in his respective possession for permanent injunction. The leave to appeal was granted on the grounds of refusal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
