Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

HADAYAT HUSSAIN versus HAQ NAWAZ


Special Relief Act 1877 Section 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Suit for Permanent Order for Protection of Property Under this plaintiff, three court cases were discovered, a co-partner who is not in exclusive possession of the aforesaid land. Yes, the order was not entitled to a permanent injunction. The plaintiff conceded in his claim that the defendant had purchased the land in question from one of the partners, the documentary evidence on the record also proved the common ownership of the parties with the others, and, thus, both Will have the right to his possession The defendant was rightfully dismissed by the three courts in order to prevent the defendant from interfering with the case in his respective possession for permanent injunction. The leave to appeal was granted on the grounds of refusal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Rabwah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.