The voluntary nature of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Section 42 Factam and the validation of the transaction which had settled the transaction in its favor, had to prove that the transfer by the Revenue Officer for the purpose of accepting the transfer thereby. Include convincing evidence of the existence of For the transfer confirmation order, the transfer did not show up in front of the Revenue Officer change in question, it was confirmed in another Revenue State and there is no explanation on record as to why it was taxed Was not confirmed. The State to which the Defendant was a beneficiary of the transaction was connected to the Trial interest and, in his daughter's preference, was insufficient to approve the transfer of the whole land. ? Defendant's testimony was also unbelievable because of the fact that he denied the plaintiff's relationship with the deceased, as it is substantially on record that Antif was the victim's real daughter and both courts have Agreed that the defendant did not further challenge the adjudicating results, that the defendant's testimony at this point concerned the transfer of the entire fraudulent land in his favor, thus could not be accepted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
