PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus EVERGREEN PRESS, LAHORE
Contract Act 1872 Section 2 (h) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The obligation to pay the bills after completion of the work assigned to the Extant Respondent (Firm). Reduced his original bills at the request of the appellant, and presented the same for payment; the bill was such unconditional respondents, then a letter was sent to the applicant stating that he had reduced the original bills. And if not paid on certain days. The defendant will be entitled to claim the original bill The defendant's claim was not paid according to the lower bill, which was later submitted by the respondent firm, such second appeal was affirmed in the High Court. To the extent of the original claim, the amended decree, according to the trial court and the injunction, the amended bills and the cover letter that the respondent sent did not require that they be paid by a certain period of time. , And if it does not, it will result in a decrease. From actual bills, it appears that in the case of unconditional letter of respondents claiming payment as of due date and non-payment of original payment, claim of original bills could not change the unconditional nature of deduction in the above bills. ? Legal and correct was not found by the High Court and the trial court certified by the High Court deserved to be rejected. The court was reinstated and the High Court was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer