Find a Lawyer

SAMUEL MASIH versus STATE

Prohibition of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Evidence From the accused, the trial buyer excise constable brought no independent evidence to prove the purchase of marijuana from which only one gram of heroin and 26 grams of hash was recovered. Had happened The personal search of the accused was also suspected and both intoxicants were imposed on him. In this case, the accused was falsely forged who complained to the top officers against an excise inspector that he had released a drug dealer. What was The suspect was acquitted in the circumstances list of advocates from Shorkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes