HASSAN MUHAMMAD versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD, OF REVENUE, PUNJAB
Appeal for restoration of occupation of section 15 mortgaged land in section 15 of mortgage land and restoration of mortgage land Act 1964, the Collector rejects the request of the Collector, Commissioner against the decision of the Collector. Appeal filed with Rejected Applicants' case was not dismissed on the basis of the limitation, but on the basis that the applicants did not join the other stakeholders as parties and partial restoration of the mortgage was not possible, the Member, Board of Revenue Commissioner In reviewing the judgment filed, the decision was not withdrawn, without seeking a record. The applicant's request was withheld over time and so the Collector's search was maintained because on the question of limitations, the two tribunals below yielded different results and were variable, Member, Board of Revenue Being the amending authority, you should get the record to decide this point. Find out more about the threshold and whether the collector's applicant's request was periodically justified as withholding, but the member decided the disputed boundary issue without examining the required record and decided the matter as neutral. Disposed to in the manner, the refusal of the applicant to review the application by the Member Board of Revenue, without looking at the record without question, was completely illegal and the judicial review under constitutional jurisdiction had its order removed by the High Court. The member, the board heard the decision of the Board of Revenue order illegal and the remand case It's the order was deleted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
