Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

JONATHAN NEWHOUSE versus STATE


Prohibition (Enforcement Hood) Order 1979 Articles 3/4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 13 and 199 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 403 The reasoning argument is the argument that the accused has already been sentenced by a special judge. And under section 156 (1) (8) of the Customs Act, 1969, the same facts were barred under section 13 of the case before a magistrate under Articles 3 and 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 ? There was no restriction on the Constitution of Pakistan and Section 403, CRPC under the Customs Act, 1969 and under Articles 3 and 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979, there were separate and separate offenses which included the provisions of section 13. There were. Constitution of Pakistan and Section 3, Cr, CCP was not applicable Constitutional application was thrown out of bounds on the facts of this case.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Dhoun Kal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.