Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus YAHYA KHAN

Enforcement of Civil Procedure Code Order I of the CPC Parties to Suite OI, R 10 & O VII, R 11 Enforcement of the required party plaintiff who challenged the date of birth in his matric certificate as filed for the declaration Decree against the University was not imposed by the Provincial Government, even though the plaintiff was a member of the Provincial Civil Service, because of the failure of the provincial government to act on behalf of the plaintiff University. On the objection raised in connection with the case's disqualification, the plaintiff claimed that the provincial government was not necessary in this case. Q could not be enforced because he wanted only the date of birth correction in the matric certificate and he did not demand relief in any way against the provincial government, in view of the fact that the plaintiff's assertion was incorrect. Will determine the history of The entitlement for the purposes of the plaintiff's retirement from the service of the Provincial Government in which the plaintiff was an employee's employer shall be from the date of his birth on the date of the effect, whether a civil suit is eligible or in accordance with the terms and conditions of service. In essence, it should be implemented because the employer is interested in fighting the case as it will ultimately have an impact and disadvantage. If the case is decided, the employee will be directly or indirectly imposed by the person on his / her terms. An essential party to the lawsuit filed by the employee in connection with or affecting or affecting the terms and conditions thereof . Defending the case without the necessary parties was against public policy, and the rule of law was the scheme of the court best advocate from Poonch lawyer