Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

FAROOQ AHMAD SHAIKH versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN


Section AA Pakistan's Constitution (1973), Article 199, inspects the Additional Commissioner for review of the petition, instructing the notice to produce documentary evidence and seeking clarification in connection with the year of some review. In which the negative signal had to be drawn and it had to be started. The proceedings under section 66A should be reviewed by the relevant year, without commenting on the facts, the constitutional petition was dealt with with remarks that in this case the reviewer of the matter was first dealt with by the IA. Should refer to C and raise whatever may be required under the law against the authenticity of the notice and, if such objection is raised, the decision of the jurisdiction to disclose the question of jurisdiction in the light of the reply already made. Should be done. The cause notice and the law were enacted by the Supreme Court in PLD 1992 SC 549

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Jaffarabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.