Find a Lawyer

LIPTON PAKISTAN LTD. versus MUBARIK ALI

Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIII, ROs 5, 6 and 7 of the CPC Suite in the AA Projector Court, instead of proceeding with the trial in court in compliance with the provisions of RR6 and 7 of the OXXIII Ordinarily, summons was issued to the defendants and at the hearing, the defendants directed them to file a written statement. The court is bound to decide the matter relating to the jurisdiction of the first plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of ODSO IIII; the CPC is not entitled to dismiss the claimant in this case under R 5 of O XXXIII, then the CP C. The defendants had to give notice immediately, as usual, to issue summons and record the plaintiff's evidence in the court without deciding the matter related to the plaintiff's contempt, before the plaintiff's contempt case. The directive was put in place to decide. In accordance with the law best advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer