Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM


The Court Fees Act 1870 Section 13 Court Memorial was not appropriate for the return of the Appellant / Appellant on the basis of which the Plaintiff had sued, the High Court's insufficient seal of appeal on the ground that the contention was appropriate and appropriate. Was sealed. Set aside the decision of the court below and the case filed by the plaintiff / appellant will be resolved before the case will be presented in court, without any fault by the plaintiff / appellant, it is paid on the memorandum. Was entitled to a refund of the outgoing court fee. The High Court issued a certificate of receipt of court fees to the person applying for the same.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.