DAULAT KHAN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (REVENUE), PUNJAB
Punjab Tenancy Act 1887 Section 14 Action against the appellant, which was in the possession of the land without the consent of the landlord, the respondents who had acquired the land under question, exercised their right of independence against the son of the appellant. The appellant was aware of everything. The case was pending and the order was passed in favor of the appellants who had obtained the lease from the vendor in question (his own son), because the appellant was not entitled to the land lease under this question. To establish a free right to continue in their possession. The power of such claim beyond the scope of the order and the possession of the appellant's lease-based claim was dishonest and it was rightly rejected by all the forums of revenue and the results of the High Court of the courts for interference with the circumstances. Was not open.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Kunri lawyer