LIAQUAT ALI CHAUDHRY versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
The constitutional jurisdiction of Article 4 (1973), Arts 199 and 212 of the Constitution of Pakistan called for the implementation of an order passed by the service tribunal in its constitutional application under which the authorities were instructed by the tribunal. To accept a request from a public servant to reverse it. Regarding another dispute of the relevant authority, the department was that the Tribunal's order was issued in accordance with the letter and spirit of the civil servant dispute notification raised in the constitutional petition regarding the terms and conditions of service of the public servant. Which cannot be entertained by hi. In view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution of Pakistan, if the court had passed an order in dispute over the decision of the tribunal, a civil servant may again refer to the tribunal for redressal of its grievances, but by the High Court in the constitutional proceedings. No instructions can be given.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Fort Abbas lawyer