ILA-UD-DIN versus D.C.
Section 2 (2) of the Evacuating Property and Homelessness Act (1975) Section 2 (2) Applicants' transfer of property at the place of applicants was not visible to the Chief Settlement Commissioner when he had a pre-requisite order. Order was found. What was the result of the use of powers that were not available on the relevant date was in the eyes of the law. On the basis of such order, no one could flow in favor of the petitioner and the PTD later issued it and he was treated unfairly. Subsequently, in the case of transfer of property by the Department of Population in any way, Lucas Standi was completely left to interfere, therefore, it was deemed fit and proper, therefore , Cannot raise their objection. The transfer of property in question, in favor of the respondent
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Digri lawyer
