ZUBAIDA IMRAN versus ABDUL SATTAR
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI, R1 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Reviewing the decision of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court in its first appeal to any of the uncontested rulers Was found in the judgment. The applicant has committed gross negligence in failing to enforce one of the respondents as the respondents in the appeal within the stipulated time limit and the applicant has taken a stand in his review petition. I was due to the inability to enforce one of the respondents order and there was such a mistake. The unintended applicant, however, was unable to explain the abnormal delay in the enforcement of the order of respondents, in fact filed an application to dismiss the appeal, which resulted in the applicant as respondent in the appeal. Applies to apply to any of the decoders on. After hearing the case and recording the case in the Supreme Court as well as the Supreme Court, it was found that non-implementation of the case within the bounds was an essential aspect of the petitioner's review of the first decision of the case by the applicant. Appeals for review of Supreme Court decision dismissed as gross negligence,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer