The statement presented by the accused under Section 304, Part I and 100 Evidence Assessment Section 342, CCP, was accepted as the basis for the application of a possible and natural defense of private defense was laid on two grounds, first. That the accused was deprived of his property (bicycles) and secondly that the latter had tried to commit a sexual offense with clause IV of section 100, in which case the PPC was fully attracted and It cannot be said of the accused that he has exceeded his right to private defense. Accordingly, he was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
