MUNTI (MST.) versus ALAM KHAN
The Civil Procedure Code Order III, Rr 2 and 4 Counsel for CPC Recognized Agents and Applicants Affecting the Parties Affecting the Parties The trial court responded to certain issues in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant's observation that the defendant The statement made by KK's lawyer was not in those cases. It is pressed that the defendants challenged the correctness of the appeal filed by the trial court on the basis of their counsel's statement not to pressurize the trial, and that statement was erroneously and Without directing the plaintiff and counseling the plaintiff that the plaintiff / defendant was prosecuted under the law to challenge the defendant's lawyer's statement through the trial, on these matters, The search recorded by the source can be challenged in the same way that the other records recorded on the basis of the same can be challenged. Was done On the basis that the evidence that the statement made by the lawyer was false, otherwise the terms of the law would not be binding on the party who alleged that his lawyer had obtained his consent or instructions. Without exception
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Doltala lawyer