ISHTIAQ AHMED versus THE MEMBER FINANCE RAILWAY BOARD MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Article 212 ()) Documents on the record of the withdrawal without notice of the increase in appeal prices from the Service Tribunal Limited have revealed that the department is continuing to pay the increment till the end of February, 1990 and so on. It was also emphasized in the arguments of 259 1989 through which the withdrawal of advance increments from the public servant was never reached. The increment was withheld for the first time, so it appealed to the service tribunal against it to consider the question of limitation. It was removed with the time limit for appeal to be served
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
