RAZALIA SHAUKAT TAREEN versus AMINA TAHIR AHMED
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 96 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Ordinance of Sections 5 and 14 Civil Courts (II of 1962), Section 18 Delay in filing an appeal before the appropriate forum for wrongful counsel of the lawyer's suit An appeal was filed on. Its value has been fixed at a certain amount against which the appeal was before the High Court and not its competence in presenting an appeal before the District Court pursuant to the terms of Section 18, Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962. Was not used. It cannot be assumed that due to the lack of proper care and precaution, the court was tried in good faith, neither Section 5, nor Section 14, the Limitation Act, 1908, were delayed in filing such an appeal. So, once the time restriction on a matter is disclosed it will not be respected, a valuable right will be in favor of the opposition party when the appeal is not banned at the time of the ban. They will not be able to keep up with the conditions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from North Wazirstan lawyer