AFTAB-UD-DIN QURESHI versus RACHAL JOSEPH
0NXNX, RR 1 & 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The agreement was charged that the trust property suite suits Oaks for specific performance, declaration, permanent injunction and damages. Application under XXX, RR1 and 2. , The CPC was also temporarily filed to provide a restraining order preventing the plaintiff from occupying the occupied premises of a building built on a high-speed area and was not listed and controversial documents. Were presented by the plaintiff which shows that the contract was for a contract. The trust constructed the building with the money to recover the tenants along with the tenant's right to recover the rent, so the case was not in favor of the plaintiff's High Court and therefore the plaintiff refused to grant any further interim relief to the plaintiff. done. No defect or legal weakness was found in the aforesaid interim order of the plaintiff's High Court. Who was a trustworthy, a synagogue that could sell a synagogue.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kasur lawyer
