In the statement given by the petitioner's objections to sections 8 and 30 of the Arbitration Act 1940, it is claimed that the person appointed in this case acted as an arbitrator and not as a referee. To raise objections against such report / award given by this person, and thus the court could not rely on it and could not pass judgment and order according to the terms and the parties on the basis of such report / award. The case remand was obtained with the consent of the statement / award given by the arbitrator / referee after the parties raised objections and conveyed their objections, from the stage when the referee's statement / award was recorded by the court. Made the decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
