Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD

Clause 15 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The High Court Plaintiff made no evidence other than the pedigree table in the evidence of his factual facts which none of his counsel had presented. Was. The plaintiffs are appearing in the witness box to prove the contents of the ethnic table, including all the courts below, in which the High Court ordered a writ of advance in favor of the plaintiffs on the basis of the genealogical table. Where the plaintiff \ s lawyer simply copied the ethnic table representing the plaintiff. The shopkeeper who gave evidence of preferential right to the motion did not have any evidence to show that it belonged to the plaintiffs (former emperors), their case could not be decided and the decisions of the following courts were set aside. And the plaintiff was dismissed in circumstances. [Proof] patent advocate from Sukkur lawyer