Find a Lawyer

TANVIR IQBAL SIDDIQI versus PRINCIPAL, OVERSEAS PAKISTANIS\' FOUNDATION (OPF) GIRLS COLLEGE, ISLAMABAD

Arts 199 and 185 (3) petitioner's services were terminated Petitioner challenged his order to terminate his services through a constitutional petition which the High Court dismissed on the ground that the respondent, although an independent entity, But no law was enacted in it, and therefore, the High Court lacked jurisdiction to intervene in the matter. The decision of the respondent was not the Federal Government's Department and it did not perform any duty in relation to the affairs of the Federation in the meaning of Article 199 of the Constitution High Court, therefore, came to its conclusion. That the constitutional petition was not authorized, no grounds for guaranteeing interference with the High Court order in dismissing the constitutional petition were stated, but the leave of appeal was denied in the circumstances. famous lower court advocate from Rajana lawyer