Find a Lawyer

RAMZAN MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD JAMIL

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 39 and 42 were filed for the declaration and cancellation of the sale-dead suit by the Seller for Intra-Court Appeal Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), which deals with the sale of property in connection with the charges. , Considered the sale and was charged. The High Court had concluded that on the basis of examination of the evidence on record, the High Court had concluded that they were executed under the authorization, misrepresentation, fraud or deception by the vendor in favor of her husband. The plaintiff, whose business was thriving, was an intelligent man and signed a contract for sale, receipt and power of attorney, knowing that his contents were dismissed by the High Court that all documents were voluntarily filed by the plaintiff. The source was executed for a valid consideration, so the execution of the sale was legal in favor of the seller and The claimant was bound to find the seller. High Court reached after scrutinizing evidence on record, intra-court appeal can not be disputed family advocate from Sargodha lawyer