Find a Lawyer

MUHARNMADASLAMKHAN versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION

Article 212 (3) publicity public servant fulfilled all the qualifications for regular development from the service tribunal of June 1985, while rejecting the appeal of public servants, it was held that the qualification of a person in a particular position and Not considered suitable for promotion of competence. The matter of the department was that the public servant was not eligible for consideration at the meeting of the Departmental Promotion Committee held on 1988. 1988 and he was promoted on his turn on the basis of seniority-less fitness, which was 5 in 1991. Development as an employee was not considered by him. The service tribunal on 5-7 1988 clearly stated the Department's Standing Department position was wrongly stated that a public servant was not found suitable for promotion but was not eligible for a public employee's application from June. Had the potential for growth. 1985; as such, he was eligible to consider promoting a regular quota against such quota. law websites from Hub Inds Estate lawyer