Find a Lawyer

FARZAND ALI versus FAZAL KARIM

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction, the use of the pre-emptor / decree holder has accumulated the cost of the sale in favor of seller / decision over time, as directed by the court, But by mentioning the name of the seller to whom the deposit was in error, the pre-emptor also mentioned the name of the shopkeeper in the relevant column of the bank challan execution application filed by the predecessor. The pass was submitted by the seller / decision accepting the objection request. Failing to comply with the direction of the order in favor of both the shopkeeper and the shopkeeper, according to which Wendy had to deposit money in favor of the order, which denied the prior umpire's execution request, the appellate court maintained under Wendy. The decision-maker himself admitted that the money deposited by the decree holder in court did not originate from the vendor whose name was mistakenly with the bank challan as well as adding the vendor's name to the bank challan. The accompanying invoice / surveillance or fault was due to be ignored and such additions to the van Does not refrain from gathering in support of the validation. To the extent that the order was collected by the borrower within a timely manner, the order in favor of the pre-emptor / regulators was intact and it should have been executed by the order of the courts, which was invalid and jurisdictional. The car was subject to a defect, because, as a result of the wrong idea, it was adopted. Under the High Court of Law under constitutional jurisdiction, power of attorney advocate Rajana lawyer