Find a Lawyer

ABIDA RIASAT RIZVI versus PHILOMENA MATHEW

13 A Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), Section 18 Landlady purchased this property in 29 1990 1990 and after giving notice to the tenant under Section 13A, the West Pakistan Civil Rent Ordinance 1959. On the basis of which the evacuation case was established. The default judgment in payment of rent was decided in favor of the landlord when the landlord applied for the intervention of the tenant to interfere with the interest and claimed that the tenant had died in 1960 and the rent The right to duty had depended on it. As a result, the Landlord's execution request was rejected by the Rent Controller as a removal order was obtained against a deceased person as the Tenant Controller rejected his execution request and preferred to appeal against the order. Was given The tenant's successor also made a different application to the rent controller. Permission to submit the rent to the court, which was allowed on 11 f f082, and as a result he began to submit, Landing in the court filed another petition against the tenant's successor, which in July, From 1970 to February 1983 there was a default charge in payment of rent. The tenant's successor sought non-service of notice under section 13A, West Pakistan Citizen Rental. Restrictions Ordinance, 1959 The rent controller allowed the tenant to evict the tenant default in payment of rent. On appeal, the High Court rejected the rent controller's order and found that there was no notice under section 13A in which the landlord was either serving the tenants. Advance when you need a advocate from Nowshero Feroz lawyer