Find a Lawyer

SHAHID QADIR versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 On the occasion of Independence Day 16 and 1991, the right to hold a public meeting through a political party, to issue instructions to the High Court to respondents, do not hold public meeting of the Metropolitan Corporation limits or anywhere. It was an administrative matter when a public gathering was scheduled to be held a day before Independence Day, restricting their rights to visit and visit the shrine of their grandfather Gunj Bakhsh and the shrine leader Allama Muhammad Iqbal. That came under his jurisdiction. District magistrates will allow the parties to hold public meetings in appropriate places, keeping in view the law and order situation, it was not understandable when the applicant or anyone else visited Allama Iqbal's tomb or Datta Ganjakh shrine. How to stop Alternative decisions that enable them to reach their destination can be decided by the relevant parties discussing the allocation of appropriate places on their capabilities, being active members of certain political parties and respondents. In his absence, no effective order could be passed by the court that there was not enough evidence to demonstrate. Respondents for this question were given notices sent to them by the court, such respondents were not given notice, the next day the constitutional petition to prevent public meeting on this score will fail alone, no citizen from his primary The right to a public meeting like Independence Day under the Constitution cannot be construed as a constitutional petition against such a meeting being misunderstood in law and fact, attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gari Habibullah lawyer