Find a Lawyer

UMER KHITAB versus CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL TELEGRAPH OFFICE, PESHAWAR

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 distinguished feature of civil servant case and other civil servant whose amendment amendment service tribunal mandatory termination of employment Was The other government employee working during retirement from the service was alleged to have sent some books through a registered parcel, which was never found in the destination office, so false charges were levied on government revenue. Under which the responsibility could not be precisely imposed against the officials. The other was against a public servant who tried to mislead his office by charging false information and a fake parcel number against a public servant; Was insufficient to determine the responsibilities of the officials. The relevant public servant was in charge of the office and was fully responsible for not keeping the record against him and accusing him. The censorship was financed by a fine, but a short charge on a certain amount of money was also ordered to be imposed. Cannot claim property advocates from Pindi gheb lawyer