KHADIM HUSSAIN versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
Section 2 (c) (i) of the West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959, the landlord and the tenant between the tenant party, determined by the landlord and personally in need of good Denies the existence of a relationship with. The statement simply denied the existence of the landlord and tenant relationship, but the nature of the occupation and possession of the property in the dispute was not disclosed. The tenant claimed that he was occupying the house as a tenant of the Equity Trust Property Board, but he could not offer any proof of such tenancy or pay the rent to the board tenant himself. The owner did not enter the witness room to reject the evidence provided in support of the tenancy, but he preferred to present his son on his behalf, the landlord gave sufficient proof of the tenant's tenancy. Proof of payment of rent in favor of and as a result of the payment of the rent together with the oral evidence. With the entries in the Recovery and Taxation Record, it has been clearly found that the tenants are in possession of the landlord and not under the Evacuee Trust Property Board. The parties and the tenant were removed for committing a default in payment of rent, and the appellate court below invalidated the finding of the rent controller.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Topi lawyer