Prohibition of law evidence (Article 10, 1984), Article 129, illusion (g) of bank effect documents which were in the jurisdiction and possession of the bank but preventing the proof of documents which were in the jurisdiction of the court and withheld from the court Consequently, the argument arises that if these documents were presented, they did not support the bank's (defendant's) bank case because of the best and relevant evidence to be withheld, the claimant's claim. Failed to prove that he had deposited a certain amount in his account and that the bank was responsible for that amount.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
