CRESCENT JUTE PRODUCTS LIMITED versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
The Law E-Evidence Order 1984 Arts 155 and 157 were produced by the witnesses and the plaintiffs wanted to present and prove the correspondence between the parties to the terms of the agreement, but the trial court cited such documents. Declined to make such a statement. The Plaintiffs / Applicants claimed that they should prove the Claimant's documents along with the original document by the same witness and while making a statement, the witness could present and render all relevant documents such as canon evidence. Provided by the provisions of. The defendants / respondents stated that the documents were submitted and there was no dispute between the parties regarding the authenticity of the dispute which was resolved in view of the offer made by the parties, orally. Will make a statement to the court and present and confirm the relevant documents. Refresh your memory when necessary with the freedom to keep a record file in front of or in it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
