Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF ANSARI versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD

Section 4 Grade B21 was never given to Appellant in the regular process although it was given B20 for a fixed period when, on this basis, on deputation appellant, the defendant for development in B21 considered with the Government employees. There was no right to do so, but they were still considered for promotion and were not found fit for the post of B21 Appellant; however, the relevant time and date were not considered in the designated advertisement. But that would have no effect because they were not regulated in B20 and the fact is that before they were 21 21 authority I was not the right person to be promoted to the post of civil servant respondents was promoted to the post B-21, was such, can not violate the service terms and conditions. Do not prove yourself a traitor before the Service Tribunal; thus, they were not entitled to claim progress in B21. law firms from Gojra lawyer