Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus SAEED AHMAD KHAN

Arts 185 and 212 Punjab Civil Service (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R10 (a) In the constitutional plea of the defendants, the High Court did not approve the final order (its interim order has been set aside). Allowed the High Court to decide whether the same was banned under Article 212 of the Constitution, including the question of jurisdiction at the end of the constitutional petition. That the defendant had sought the appointment of the applicant on the basis of the accusation of proceedings, to which he was not entitled. R 10 (a) Punjab Civil Service (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, which the defendant himself claimed claimed the fact that the connected civil appeal (against the decision of the service tribunal) was dealt with by the Supreme Court. Given that this service tribunal was held. Prior to promoting the history of the respondents, it was not possible that the High Court would also assist in handling the Constitutional petition by the High Court W as respondents' constitutional request would be dealt with in two months. solicitors from Hayatabad lawyer