Section 13D evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 was not recovered from the accused person, the prosecution's evidence contradicted the material and did not encourage the prosecutor to trust that he suppressed the terrorist activity ( Under section 8 of the Special Courts), in 1975, the burden of proof was on the accused because the prosecution had failed to prove the possession or control of the accused, and in this case the allegedly recovered arms was recovered. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
