SAGHIR AHMAD versus GULZAR KHAN
Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 96 Appeal filed before the delay of one day Conditional Accession Defendants received certified copies on 22 1 1986, the last date for filing an appeal was 19 2 1986, The appeal was filed on 20 2 1986, more than a day for the condolences of the defendant's illness was reported on the ground between 8 2 1986 and 19 2 1986, however, the defendant filed 8 medical 1986 Presented a medical certificate in history, while admitting in his statement before the court that he visited. The doctor could not be relied upon only on 19 2 1986 and not before such certification, besides which it was not permissible to be on the printed form and he had made the document showing that the defendant had his own Based on the statement that he met the doctor. 19 2 1986, it cannot be assumed that he was disqualified to the extent that he could not approach his own lawyer nor authorize or direct him against any of his brothers and sisters. The same decree was adopted, filing an appeal even till the date of the deadline. No excerpt from the department records (in which the defendant was serving) was presented, which would indicate that the defendants were on medical leave during the relevant period only because the defendant filed an affidavit. Was not made but it will not be proved that the delayed appeal was filed for good reason, even if it is deemed that the defendant was suffering from the stated illness, it cannot be said that the appeal on the relevant date. Not filing was beyond the control of the late contracting defendant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer