HAMIDAN BIBI versus SADAR DIN
Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R 11 & 5 115 of CPC Plants O VII Compliance with the Court's order to make good reductions in judicial fees Not effective The trial court ordered the plaintiff to make good reductions in court fees Consequently, in the case of dismissal of his case, the plaintiff filed an appeal against the dismissal of his suit and promised the appellate court that it would make a good reduction in the court fees. The plaintiff did not make a good cut because of a good reduction in court fees. The court fee also had the legal obligation to comply with the direction issued by the plaintiff in the first trial at the first hearing by the plaintiff after the appellate nomination of the memorandum rejected by the appellate court was extended. Failed to fulfill responsibility for. There was a set of contradictions in the matter. The only proper order that could be granted by the appellate court in the circumstances was the order from which the appeal of the memorandum was denied, demanding interference with the High Court's exercise of its jurisdiction in order to dismiss the appeal of the memorandum. Was not done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Hyderabad lawyer