ZARIN KHAN versus AMIR SULTAN
Consistent with Section 15 (4) Second Appeal, two courts had ruled against the tenant that after denying the ownership of the landlord, the tenant would be removed from the premises in question. The scope of interference in the second appeal under section 15 (4) of the Law Enforcement was to restrict the Western Pakistan Civil Rent Ordinance, 1959, only where such searches were based on misinterpretation of evidence or were unlawful. ????? The record of the evidence or the material piece of the evidence is shown as defective. The court below did not find any unlawful interference or irregularity in the finding of cohesion, which sought intervention in the second appeal. was done.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Moro lawyer
