HASCOL PETROLEUM (PVT.) LTD. versus COLLECTOR ADJUDICATION, QUETTA
Section 194 Appeal filed by owner of seized goods to Appellate Tribunal Lokos Standi, who did not join judicial proceedings, Scope Customs authorities seized an oil tanker filled with weapons SSD oil, to give show cause notice Subsequently, the smuggled HSD oil-filled oil tanker was a seized oil marketing company / owner of the seized oil did not join the court proceedings but the appellate tribunal confirmed before this order was actually challenged. The appeal was filed by an oil marketing company which is non-existent in the matter, saying against the appellant. No order was approved. But the order was against the owner of the seized oil tanker and the driver of the tanker, who had not filed an appeal before the appellate tribunal within the stipulated period, so the original order was finalized after any final form was obtained. Can't be bothered on stage. Courts by any authority Appellant / Oil Marketing Company had no locks stand for filing an application Eel as though it had not deliberately joined the prosecution to claim ownership of the transporter oil while the oil tanker Information will be obtained from the tanker / driver's owner regarding arrest / detention and issuance of showcase notices.
