ALI BUX versus STATE
Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 ES 14 and 8 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 555 The police report had no alleged allegations against the applicant in which the alleged applicants branded it as Has declared. It was not specified that the applicant was shown to be a defendant in the proceedings under Section 1110, CR PC, in a criminal case and that he was not guilty in any case, only the witness against the applicant. The police officer was the accused and in the name of the accused, the magistrate acted illegally in the custody of the applicant and passing the order under Section 8 (3) of the Act, apart from the statement of a police officer. Action can be taken below. Section 14 of the Act against the applicant was intended to misuse the court proceedings and accordingly it was abolished.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Mir Ali lawyer
