EJAZ AHMAD CHEEMA versus JAVED MAHMOOD GHUMAN
The nomination papers for the acceptance nomination were filed by the candidate in accordance with the condition represented by the nomination papers of the People Act 1976, on the condition that the candidate pay the loan against his deceased father and four other persons. The speed at which the candidate challenged the implementation of this condition. Did not receive outstanding debt or was a partner with his father in obtaining the loan, and even the remaining debt was not paid in full by his father, but four other people who had paid for his father. He was also responsible for making the same payment. The candidate's deceased father has left behind him three other sons, two daughters and a wife. The candidate, under the circumstances, could not be declared defaulter even though he would have to pay the debt to the extent of his share in the property. Was inherited from The conditions imposed on the candidate by the Returning Officer were, in the circumstances, inappropriate.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Hafizabad lawyer