Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

TARIQ AZIZ versus THE STATE


Section 14 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898) of Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975, Termination of Police in Section 561A7 Police filed a report against the petitioner completely ignoring the provisions of Section 6 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975. Yes, and action was taken. On this score only the applicants against the applicant can be declared invalid, there is no doubt that the applicant was already presented before the Tribunal in history, but was not presented on the day when the witnesses Was checked and the order was approved. Under section 8 (3) (b), the tribunal had proceeded against the applicant, therefore, accordingly, the action of the litigation against the applicant before the tribunal was canceled is not pending.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mohmand lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.