Find a Lawyer

NAZIM HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

In the value of Section 13 evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965, there was no evidence on record to put the accused in charge of possession of the Kalashnikov House from which it was recovered which was admitted to the outer gate. There was no prisoner in the house. The record also does not show that the aforesaid house was recovered from the accused only on the accused of being the target, in this case the trial court overlooked all the principles of governance of justice for the perpetrators. The sentence was filed in this case. The accused was acquitted in the circumstances divorce advocates from Chowk Munda lawyer