Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 permanent injunction suit for jurisdictional jurisdiction, was the practice of the applicant / plaintiff's case that the land in the dispute is part of Shumtal Deh and he is also the proprietor in the village. As the owner of the land was in exclusive ownership of the same property, the other co-owners / defendants could not interfere with the acquisition of the evidence without any distribution. Evidence on the record shows that all the owners of the village According to the previous jamabandi, the disputed land was part of the candlelight vigil. , But as a result the plaintiff / applicant of the jamabandi was listed as the land farmer as the defendant does not appear in the possession of this country to any of the accused along with the adjoining courts It was argued that this country was controversially aristocratic and was later shown in Jamabandi as a "non-possible \ pp Chiprias", thus it would be considered that the Shimlata Deh land and all of the plaintiffs / petitioners. Owners will be in control. Er could not stand trial for exclusive possession with him, evidence on the record clearly shows that the plaintiff came to the land as a farmer in a dispute in 1951, and until the time of filing a lawsuit Was in the control of and still remains today. The plaintiff's testimony was entered into by the court and, by rejecting the plaintiff's case established by jamabandi for the year 1951, 52 courts, based on judicial judicial decision and hypothetical verdict based on the law, invalid judicial decision and legal strategy. The material exempted from them under famous high court advocate from Jehangira lawyer