Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL REHMAN versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN


Martial Law Order 1977 (Zone D) No 16 No. 16 and 46 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) cancellation of allotment under Martial Law Order 16 and 46 relating to the accuracy of Martial Law Orders 16 and 46, which was allotment 1. Between 1 1972 and 4 7 1977, when the sale proceeded, the Collector executed in favor of the Altis (applicants) on 16 6 1981, an appeal was allowed to consider whether Are martial law orders 16 and 46 applicable or not? In the case of the allotment; and it is also argued that even though sales of inappropriate persons have entered into the record of revenue, they were not given any opportunity to be heard before the cancellation order was issued. The lack of relevant authority in this regard not only violated the principles of natural justice but also the express bar in the order itself stated that no allotment should be canceled without giving the allotment a chance to be heard.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Hyderabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.